~ ALICIA M. JOHNSON ~
Mom | Assistant Professor | Consumer Financial Decision-Making Researcher | Inquirer/Disseminator of (Nonprofit) Marketing Insights | Consultant
Isenberg School of Management, UMass Amherst
Broadly, my research explores how consumers make financial decisions as individuals, romantic partners, adult children, and parents. Specifically, I evaluate factors that influence how consumers make debt financing and debt repayment decisions, set budgets and manage household finances, allocate funds among their children, and determine donation amounts and causes to support. More recently, I consider the role of the social service sector, as well as individual and systemic barriers, in influencing consumers’ financial and overall well-being.
In addition to these lines of inquiry, I also explore how consumers respond to marketing communications to make food and sustainable consumption decisions. In my future research, I strive to develop interventions firms can implement to improve consumer financial and overall well-being.
My work has been published in the Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Advertising, and Journal of Business Research. I teach one graduate-level course (Marketing and Society), and one undergraduate course (Nonprofit Marketing). I am also a consultant to, and committee advisory member of, two US based nonprofit organizations, and serves as a board member of a South African based nonprofit organization.
Prior to joining academia, my work spanned roles in personal finance, business management, and supply chain management. I have a PhD from the University of Arkansas, an MBA from Clarkson University, and a BBA from SUNY Canton.
CURRICULUM VITAE | UNIVERSITY PROFILE | LINKEDIN PROFILE | RESEARCH INSIGHTS I, II & III
~ MOST RECENT PUBLICATION ~
Loan Amount versus Monthly Payments: The Effect of Loan Application Formats on Consumer Borrowing Decisions (2023) Journal of Consumer Research
Abstract
Do different loan application formats affect consumer loan requests? Six studies show that when consumers are asked to provide a preferred monthly payment (MP) (vs. loan amount [LA]), they request different principal amounts. This is because these loan application formats differ in the scale-compatible information they bring to consumers’ mind. When LAs are elicited, consumers think of and request the cost of the expenditure they seek to finance. When MPs are elicited, however, consumers think of their monthly budget slack to construct and then request MPs they perceive to be affordable. For lower cost loans with a given term and interest rate, the MP (vs. LA) format results in larger principal requests. This effect reverses for higher cost acquisitions because individuals’ budget slack caps out around $500 per month. These studies provide insight into how consumer loan application formats can affect consumer borrowing, as well as the psychological underpinnings responsible for the effect. Theoretical, managerial, and consumer welfare implications of the findings are discussed.
When I am not working, or sometimes even when I am, I enjoy spending time with my family, running, biking, being outdoors, and
helping others in my community (see more here).
